Thursday, September 12, 2013

Smoke Warning More Graphic Elsewhere



                                                 
                                                             STOP SMOKING
                                                                                  
                                                    
          More than 40 country’s us photos on packs of car to show health risk. If Americans think the proposed graphic warnings for cigarette packs are frightening, they should see what’s on packages in other countries, and many more are in the process of implement them.
       The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed 36 possible illustrations and will pick one to run with each of nine new health warning statements it is to require on packaging and ads as of October 2012. Up until now, U.S. cigarette packs have carried only tads warnings and those haven’t changed since 1985. The US is playing catch-up with countries on every continent and some researchers say a number of its proposed images aren’t scary enough.
                In 2001 Canada was the first to add picture warnings; many other countries have surpassed it. One problem is that after spending much time and money developing new ones, the Canadian government has never changed them. As a result the warnings” effectiveness has waned.l
                Uruguay on the other hand, is battling tobacco giant Philip Morris International over its warning which cover 80% of the package the largest in the world. The company has filed an arbitration claim with the World Bank alleging that Uruguay’s warnings violate its trade agreement with Switzerland where Philip Morris is based. The warning leaves little space “for display of legally protected traders,” the company says. In addition Philip Morris alleges “repulsive and shocking pictures such as a grotesquely disfigured baby don’t accurately depict health effects.”
                Many countries besides Uruguay require images that are bigger and harsher than those proposed by the FDA which include women blowing smoke in children”s faces and diseased lungs.
                Some of the proposed pictures are cartoons. Using them would be risky, because, “smokers might not take them seriously, “says Danny Carr an assistant professor of sales at Columbia University,       
           “Believability is one of the key issues for warnings.”
            The FDA might have been concerned that gross-type visual would offend smoker, evoking anger instead of a desire to quit, but research has found that the scarier the images the more likely smokers were to say they feel inspired to quit. It doesn’t matter what the theme is. The more graphic the more positive the response by smokers.
                Brazil’s anti-smoking images, introduced in 2004 have been called the scariest in the world.          To be continued… 

Dr. Karl Wallace D.D.S.                                                                                                                                                                      To read more go to:     w.w.w.karlwallaceblog.blogspot.com                                                   

US GRANT - Partial First Edition

I've pulled together some of my most popular content into a book. Here's a first look for all my followers:

US Grant - Chapters 1-3


Popular Posts

Ogden Skydive and Leadville Trail Information

Check out my sons web site
Check out my other sons web site

Go Home

Followers